Impaired waters in Kentucky.
Kentucky reported 6,332 assessed waters to EPA. 4,310 of them are impaired — a designated use is not being supported — and 3,378 remain on the 303(d) list, still awaiting a cleanup plan. Those two figures differ because a water leaves the list when its plan is written, not when it gets better. Across the subbasins reaching Kentucky, 94% of subwatersheds contain any assessed water at all; the rest have not been looked at.
Subbasins across Kentucky.
One shape per HUC8 subbasin, shaded by how many of its assessed subwatersheds are intersected by an impaired water. Grey means no assessed water at all.
105 of the 1,891 subwatersheds in these subbasins contain no assessed water and are drawn in grey. That is not a clean bill of health — it is the absence of one. Clean Water Act assessment is done by the states, on their own schedules and budgets, and no state assesses everything.
- A third to two thirdsBetween a third and two thirds of them.
- More than two thirdsMore than two thirds of them.
Kentucky: 2024 assessment cycle, approved by EPA. States report to EPA on independent cycles, so the national map covers several years at once.
Why Kentucky's waters are listed.
EPA groups every cause of impairment into 36 categories. These are the ones Kentucky reported most, counted by how many impaired waters carry each. A single water usually carries several.
- Pathogens1,912
- Sediment1,652
- Unknown — biota1,148
- Nutrients944
- Salinity648
- Unknown462
- Low oxygen362
- Metals338
228 of Kentucky's impaired waters are category 4C: impaired by something that is not a pollutant at all — a dam that changed the flow regime, a straightened channel, an invasive species. Those waters are genuinely impaired, and calling them polluted would be wrong. A cleanup plan cannot fix them, which is why they never appear on the 303(d) list.
Impaired waters in Kentucky.
A sample of Kentucky's impaired waters, alphabetically, with what each is listed for. Every row links to EPA's own waterbody report — this page re-serves the state's determination, it does not make one.
| Water | Status | Listed for |
|---|---|---|
| Acorn Fork 0.0 to 1.0 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork 0.0 to 1.0 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork 1.0 to 1.9 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork 1.0 to 1.9 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork UT 0.0 to 0.2 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment |
| Acorn Fork UT 0.0 to 0.2 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment |
| Acorn Fork UT 0.0 to 0.25 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork UT 0.0 to 0.25 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork UT of UT 0.0 to 0.55 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Acorn Fork UT of UT 0.0 to 0.55 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Sediment, Salinity |
| Addison Branch 0.05 to 1.75 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | pH |
| Addison Branch 0.05 to 1.75 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | pH |
| Addison Branch UT 0.0 to 1.05 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | pH |
| Addison Branch UT 0.0 to 1.05 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | pH |
| Allcorn Creek 0.7 to 3.2 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown — biota, Hydrology, Sediment, Temperature |
| Allcorn Creek 0.7 to 3.2 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown — biota, Hydrology, Sediment, Temperature |
| Allen Creek 0.0 to 3.8 | ImpairedImpaired by something that is not a pollutant | Unknown — biota |
| Allen Creek 0.0 to 3.8 | ImpairedImpaired by something that is not a pollutant | Unknown — biota |
| Allen Creek 0.0 to 4.15 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown |
| Allen Creek 0.0 to 4.15 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown |
| Allen Fork 0.0 to 4.3 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Pathogens |
| Allen Fork 0.0 to 4.3 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Pathogens |
| Allen Fork UT 0.0 to 2.0 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Pathogens |
| Allen Fork UT 0.0 to 2.0 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Pathogens |
| Allison Creek 0.0 to 4.95 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Nutrients, Low oxygen, Pathogens |
| Allison Creek 0.0 to 4.95 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Nutrients, Low oxygen, Pathogens |
| Alum Cave Branch 1.7 to 3.60 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown |
| Alum Cave Branch 1.7 to 3.60 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown |
| Angle Creek 0.0 to 0.8 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown, Pathogens |
| Angle Creek 0.0 to 0.8 | On the 303(d) listOn the 303(d) list; a cleanup plan is still owed | Unknown, Pathogens |
4,310 waters in Kentucky are impaired in total. This table shows 30 of them; the live map carries every subbasin, and EPA's How's My Waterway carries every individual water.
Where the listings concentrate.
The HUC12 subwatersheds in and around Kentucky intersected by the most waters still on the 303(d) list. A single listed river crosses several subwatersheds and is counted in each, so these are not counts of distinct waters.
| Subwatershed | Listed | Leading causes |
|---|---|---|
| Headwaters Pigeon Creek | 43 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| Spice Creek-Tug Fork | 36 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| Outlet Pigeon Creek | 36 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| South Fork Tug Fork-Tug Fork | 34 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| Sandlick Creek-Tug Fork | 32 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| Miller Creek-Tug Fork | 30 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Pathogens |
| Lower Left Fork Beaver Creek-Beaver Creek | 30 | Unknown, Metals, Nutrients |
| Middle Roundstone Creek | 30 | Unknown — biota, Metals, Nutrients |
| South Yellow Creek Fork-Ohio River | 30 | Unknown — biota, Dioxins, Mercury |
| West Hickman Creek | 28 | Unknown — biota, Habitat loss, Nutrients |
| Claylick Creek | 28 | Unknown — biota, Nutrients, Pathogens |
| Cedar Crest Lake-Crooked Creek | 27 | Unknown — biota, Low oxygen, Pathogens |
What these listings mean.
The three things worth understanding before drawing a conclusion from this map.
Clean Water Act assessment is done by the states, on their own budgets. Roughly half the country's subwatersheds contain no assessed water at all, and a water nobody has tested is not a water known to be safe. Everything on this page is a share of what has been assessed, and the not-assessed share is shown next to it for exactly that reason.
A water is impaired when a designated use — swimming, fishing, drinking water supply, aquatic life — is not being supported. It sits on the 303(d) list only while it is still awaiting a cleanup plan, a TMDL. Once that plan is written the water comes off the list and is still impaired. So the listed figure is the regulatory backlog, and the impaired figure is the state of the water; they are not two views of one number.
Driftwise re-serves EPA's ATTAINS data from a copy we refresh; we do not make assessments, and states update theirs on multi-year cycles. For the authoritative record of any water in Kentucky, use EPA's How's My Waterway or Kentucky directly.
See Kentucky on the live map.
This page is a still frame. The national map is interactive — pan, zoom, filter, and read every record behind what you see here.
Every subwatershed in the country against the states’ own Clean Water Act assessments — what is impaired, what is still on the 303(d) list, what is causing it, and how much of the country nobody has assessed at all.
More on Kentucky.
Every Driftwise public map covers Kentucky. No login, no paywall.
Watershed Explorer
Click any point in the country and read what six federal datasets say about it — flow, drought, fire, flood forecast, satellite cyanobacteria screening and Clean Water Act impairment — each one labelled with what it is actually a fact about.
Wildfire & Smoke Map — Kentucky
Official NIFC fire perimeters and incident points under NOAA’s HRRR-Smoke near-surface forecast, filterable by size, state, and containment.
Streamflow Map — Kentucky
Every reporting USGS stream gauge in the country, coloured by how today’s flow ranks against that gauge’s own record for this calendar day.
U.S. Drought Map — Kentucky
The U.S. Drought Monitor — the country’s official weekly drought assessment — drawn across five severity categories from D0 to D4.
Flood Outlook Map — Kentucky
NOAA’s river forecast centres call the next few days at every forecast gauge in the country, on the National Weather Service’s own flood categories — action, minor, moderate and major.
Cyanobacteria Bloom Map — Kentucky
NASA and EPA’s satellites read a pigment index over roughly 2,300 U.S. lakes large enough to resolve at 300 m. A pre-screening indicator, not a health assessment, and never a substitute for your state’s advisory.
Critical Habitat & Protected Waters Map — Kentucky
Every river and stream the federal government has designated as ESA critical habitat, the listed species each unit is designated for, and who manages the protected land around it.
Impaired waters by state.
Every state, with the number of waters still on its 303(d) list. The national map covers all of them at once.
- Alabama875 on the 303(d) list
- Alaska39 on the 303(d) list
- Arizona161 on the 303(d) list
- Arkansas662 on the 303(d) list
- California2,199 on the 303(d) list
- Colorado1,204 on the 303(d) list
- Connecticut647 on the 303(d) list
- Delaware484 on the 303(d) list
- District of Columbia42 on the 303(d) list
- Florida3,794 on the 303(d) list
- Georgia808 on the 303(d) list
- Hawaii676 on the 303(d) list
- Idaho1,535 on the 303(d) list
- Illinois2,455 on the 303(d) list
- Indiana8,519 on the 303(d) list
- Iowa1,158 on the 303(d) list
- Kansas2,635 on the 303(d) list
- Kentucky3,378 on the 303(d) list
- Louisiana673 on the 303(d) list
- Maine330 on the 303(d) list
- Maryland1,156 on the 303(d) list
- Massachusetts1,942 on the 303(d) list
- Michigan3,182 on the 303(d) list
- Minnesota4,156 on the 303(d) list
- Mississippi484 on the 303(d) list
- Missouri774 on the 303(d) list
- Montana807 on the 303(d) list
- Nebraska910 on the 303(d) list
- Nevada509 on the 303(d) list
- New Hampshire2,884 on the 303(d) list
- New Jersey1,696 on the 303(d) list
- New Mexico602 on the 303(d) list
- New York1,255 on the 303(d) list
- North Carolina2,454 on the 303(d) list
- North Dakota468 on the 303(d) list
- Ohio2,508 on the 303(d) list
- Oklahoma1,453 on the 303(d) list
- Oregon3,988 on the 303(d) list
- Pennsylvania109,627 on the 303(d) list
- Puerto Rico358 on the 303(d) list
- Rhode Island399 on the 303(d) list
- South Carolina2,510 on the 303(d) list
- South Dakota369 on the 303(d) list
- Tennessee3,240 on the 303(d) list
- Texas1,524 on the 303(d) list
- Utah793 on the 303(d) list
- Vermont287 on the 303(d) list
- Virginia4,865 on the 303(d) list
- Washington6,019 on the 303(d) list
- West Virginia3,221 on the 303(d) list
- Wisconsin2,594 on the 303(d) list
- Wyoming131 on the 303(d) list
One platform for three monitoring programs.
Run a mark-recapture program, coordinate a multi-partner invasive species response, or manage the waterway program for a state park or conservation nonprofit. Bring your own program to the demo and we'll run Driftwise on it, live.
Request a demoA free 30-minute working session with your data on screen.
Scope a pilot for your program.
Tell us about your program — a watershed, an infestation, a trail system. We'll walk through how a field record becomes the report your agency and funders sign off on.
A working call, not a pitch
We spend the time on your actual program — the data you have now and the report you owe.
Guided onboarding
We import your existing records and configure the setup alongside your team. Role-based in-product tours carry the rest of the crew after the call.
Start with one season
Run a single pilot first and expand when it earns the next watershed.
Send us your corridor, watershed, or program and we'll build the working demo around your records. We reply within one business day.
Click to reveal — we obscure the address to cut spam.